Economics and Markets Lab
May 18, 2008, 12:27:28 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Benvenuti sul forum di Usemlab!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: "I belli" di mises.org  (Read 3435 times)
AlessioR
Regulars
Hero Member
*
Posts: 520


on the blackboard:reading makes a country great


« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2008, 10:56:10 PM »

http://www.mises.org/story/2926
Our Financial House of Cards and How to Start Replacing It With Solid Gold

 
Logged
AlessioR
Regulars
Hero Member
*
Posts: 520


on the blackboard:reading makes a country great


« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2008, 10:13:40 PM »

http://mises.org/story/2924
Oh Keynesian, Where Art Thou?
We are about to be reminded that empires do not fall because of barbarians at the gates, wars of civilizations, or free trade. It's the inflation that kills them

Quote
Depending on the particular story, we reach various versions of the Keynesian ideology, which apparently has a universal cure for the economy: government policies. Again, it may be fiscal policy, or monetary policy. Pick a version of your Keynesian story, and you'll know which solution to pursue. But the conclusion is rather obvious: the state, through its compulsory means, has to boost the level of aggregate demand in some way to stop the economy from falling into recession...

For a sustained amount of time the US government did everything it could to aggressively engage in monetary and fiscal pumping. Budget deficits soared and the interest rates were lowered to absurd levels. This helped the supply of dollars to go through the roof and prepare the green paper money for a remarkable collapse...

What matters for economic activity is the money supply and the consumer price index (CPI) determined by it. The most famous monetarist, Milton Friedman, was primarily obsessed with money supply and keeping the CPI stable. If the CPI is unwavering, then the economy has to be in good condition. Problems might arise only when the official rate of inflation gets out of control. But if it is kept at low levels, then the economy is under control, and the monetary policy is sound.In an interview from 2003 (conducted by Henri Lepage), Friedman stated that the conditions of prosperity are secured. The inflation monster has been tamed, unemployment is low, there is no financial crisis and no deflation, productivity is growing, and banks are in good shape...For many years Friedman praised Alan Greenspan's monetary policy. And although he did differ in some way from others (as most Keynesians differ one from another) and did not accept the discretionary tools that the Fed used...

Now, as we see, the current problems can be explained neither by the monetarist way of thinking nor by the Keynesian. Both macroeconomic approaches are flawed and cannot be applied to the recent crisis. The remarkable silence from those two doctrines proves the point. I do not mean that they do not discuss the crisis. Mainstream economists do talk about it, but they are not using the Keynesian and monetarist doctrine...

nobody seriously states that the crisis is a result of decrease in aggregate demand and lack of loosened policies...Price relations, resource scarcity, the structure of liabilities and expected revenues between the firms in the market are the key issues. Welcome to the world of Austrian economics...

One should not forget about Mises's great insight that (http://www.mises.org/story/2370) middle-of-the-road-policy leads to socialism, which applies well beyond price controls. His contribution was that the price control imposed upon the market would not lead to expected results, but instead would create chaos. The endgame is to either abolish all controls, or go along the way of extreme interventionism and end up with full socialism, in which the government runs the economy...

What we are witnessing is a great demonstration of one of the most important Austrian contributions to monetary economics: that a central bank has socialistic potential. Think about it. In socialism, the central planner increases the amount of goods he possesses by means of expropriation. If he needs anything, a decree is the way to acquire it. In the central banking system, the decree is replaced by something else: printing money. If something is needed, direct expropriation and an official decree are not required; fiat money is enough. Print the money and you can buy anything you want...

The ultimate boundaries differ of course. Under old-fashioned socialism, there is always the possibility of creating enslavement through direct use of force. In contrast, in the financial socialism that is being created right now, the last stop is hyperinflation, which will ultimately destroy central bankers' only way of redistributing property — fiat money...

Mainstream economists will not advise the abolition of this tool...








« Last Edit: May 11, 2008, 08:37:28 PM by AlessioR » Logged
AlessioR
Regulars
Hero Member
*
Posts: 520


on the blackboard:reading makes a country great


« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2008, 09:23:04 PM »

Two Cents on the Penny -materie prime come termometro inflazionistico-
http://www.mises.org/story/2938
It costs money to make money.
Quote
The price of the zinc required to mint pennies has been steadily increasing; according to a recent article in the New Yorker, the cost of producing a penny is now 1.7 cents — it costs nearly two pennies to make one. Producing a coin at a higher cost than the value of the coin itself is known as "negative seigniorage." This phenomenon has led many to question the continued existence of the penny and suggest it be abolished. Understanding negative seigniorage in economic terms will lead to an opposite conclusion: hundred dollar bills should be done away with.
Why is the price of zinc going up?
it is the falling value of dollars themselves that is causing the price to go up. The greater the supply of a good, the less value each individual unit of that good will have. This is known as the law of marginal utility. Applying this law to money leads to the conclusion that when the mint prints more dollars, the value of existing dollars will decrease, and thus it will take more dollars to purchase metals and other goods.
The government is able to "print" money both electronically by manipulating the interest rate and through the physical creation of more dollars and cents.Any increase in the money supply, however minute, dilutes the purchasing power of existing dollars and thus throws off economic calculation. Curtailing the power of the government to print money means creating a more sound, prosperous economy.
What makes coins and other hard commodities desirable as currency is that they cannot simply be printed. Gold, copper, and silver must be dug out of the ground, so the government is limited in the amount that it can spend and, therefore, inflate.
Government fiat does not raise the standard of living; production on the market does. In industries where there is innovation and more production, prices fall.
In a world without government intervention in the money supply and economy, prices would fall to the point that the penny would take on a new relevance. Instead of decrying the penny, economists should recognize its potential to combat government inflation and advocate a return to an even harder currency. Coins may be expensive for the government to make, but this ensures that our money retains some value, regardless of what the government does

« Last Edit: May 11, 2008, 08:37:12 PM by AlessioR » Logged
AlessioR
Regulars
Hero Member
*
Posts: 520


on the blackboard:reading makes a country great


« Reply #18 on: May 11, 2008, 08:36:31 PM »

http://www.mises.org/story/2958
Are We Running Out of Food?
Quote
there are...two issues of primary importance related to food shortages and food costs:
First, the underlying cause of any shortage is the lack of a free market, since genuine shortages cannot appear in a free market. Instead, while prices of goods would likely rise at the onset of reduced supplies, the goods in question would always be available at some price — and the higher the price, the more the supply would increase to meet demand, which would then of course reduce the price...
The second issue...is that high food prices are a manifestation of current worldwide price inflation. World governments have been printing money at very high rates this decade. While the United States has been expanding the money supply by "only" about 10–15 percent per year, many countries have printed money at rates exceeding 50 percent per year. This money, which had been previously contained mostly in world stock markets, has now also spread to commodity markets, from which the prices of food are derived. Since money is now being created faster than goods are being created, prices are rising...

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080511/apfn_fixing_food_country_glance.html?.v=1
A glance at how governments have responded to rising world food prices
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!